Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-2705: > > I thought a while back we said that for 2.0 we would focus on > functionality, before usability. Making usability more of a 2.1 focus. > Has that changed? > > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-1951:
I know. The issue is assigned to you, I did not set it to critical myself, you did on March 3 ;-), so I wanted to double check before taking action. I guess it should be scaled back to "major" priority and moved back to 2.0.x? > This is just a meta issue. And probably something we can just close. > > That leaves us with 2 critical issues left. Scanning through the rest > nothing strikes me as a blocker for another beta release. However I > would like to get http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-3078 (moving web2 > to core) done before we get to the RC stage. I am happy to take that on > if you want to reassign that one to me. Right right, major point for me as well. I think there are two action items there: - writing enough docs to claim it is documented. I guess we only have to document the module architecture and convention, everything Wicket related can point to the Wicket wiki and/or to a book - get to 40% test coverage in all module. At the moment cobertura reports: core: 41% wms: 38% wfs: 69% wcs: 70% demo: 57% app: 44% The formal limit is not far, probably one test away in wms, thought raising up a bit the coverage in core would not hurt. I can take it, should be quick enough. Docs wise we can decide on a structure and split the work if you want. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
