Well, in the meantime, I've committed a basic page about the Properties data store. Please expand on this when you have the time. Then no one will have any excuse for being confused. :)
http://docs.geoserver.org/trunk/en/user/data/properties.html Thanks, Mike Pumphrey OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I would very much like to see the property data store retained in its > current form. In addition to being exceptionally useful for pedagogical > purposes, I can imagine intermediate-level users adding a one-point or > two-point layer with some markers to a map, some bit of static data that > is not handy in a database but they would like to serve to improve their > maps. I can imagine little python scripts creating property files. Sure > these things can grow to inefficient proportions, but just because a > tool can be misused does not mean we should take it away. > > It should be documented. We have made a lot of use of property file data > stores, so I am in a position to document them. If you agree to keep it > I will document it. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
