Hi, dont have the answer you are looking for I expect..
the _plan_ is to replace geometryless by the app-schema functionality. This can done at the app-schema part - , but is held back by the broader GML 3 support - we dont have an object model we can map into, there is a point solution mapping 2D geometry objects into the bindings. I've been trying to get this relaxed to allow a complete solution for a while - maybe your voice can help with the priorities. I cant fix it myself because there is auto-generated code in the loop, and the autogeneration process is not yet repeatable. Making it work in 1.7 is feasible, but not as important to me as 2.0 support. You would need to port app-schemas sql-datastore as well, or refactor the code to remove the dependency. Sorry if this is not good news, and I feel for you.. Rob On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Andy Rowan <andrew.ro...@oit.state.nj.us> wrote: > Hi, > > We're currently running geoserver 1.7.6 to produce WFS and WMS from > various sources. I'm hoping to add the ability to do WFS from a plain > non-spatial database table (Oracle or SQL Server) that includes fields > with x and y coordinates but no actual geometry object ... no SDE or > Oracle Spatial involved. I've read about the geometryless/locationsxy > work in geotools that it seems never made it to supported status. And I > see in the previous generation of docs that this can be accomplished > with the "community schemas" build of 1.6 that Rob Atkinson has put up. > But we moved up to 1.7 because we were having trouble with 1.6 giving us > slw performance accessing ArcSDE. I also see that "community schemas" > has morphed into app-schemas and become an official extension in 2.0. > But I don't see in the present iteration of the docs anything about the > geometryless part. So, the following questions: > > Is it possible using 2.0 and the app-schemas extension to produce a WFS > from a geometryless data store? (And if so, I'd love any pointers as to > how to accomplish that in terms of configuration language. I do have > 2.0-rc1 installed and running with the extension, but I'm kind of at sea > in terms of putting together the configuration for the data store.) > > If not, what would it take for me to add the geometryless data store > capability into 1.7.6? Just build it with some additional code? (Again, > pointers as to how would be very welcome, which extra code to grab, how > to plug it into the build, and how to configure the data store.) > > If both of those turn out to be too difficult, I suppose I will just > grab the community schemas war file and run a separate instance just for > the geometryless tables, and continue using 1.7.6 for everything else.) > > > I appreciate any help! Thanks. > > -Andy Rowan > NJ Office of GIS > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
