Luca Morandini ha scritto: > On 26/04/10 19:09, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Just curious if you looked into the question at all. A WKT based mark >> factory is fine by me ;-) > > That I did, including some tests (patches at the end of this message); of > course, > some user doc will have to be written too. By the way, the source code > includes > some more well-known shapes that I've found useful.
Ah, thanks for the patch. Can you attach it to a jira in Geotools? Here on the ml I'll probably forget about it before I have time to merge it with GeoTools. Btw, I did not think about using a WKT literal, but yeah, it's a simple solution (I was thinking more or a property file, but in that case you also have to make the property file location pluggable and so on, which might be annoying). > As per SVG, I've found out some "orphan" code that may be of interest > (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04729.html). > > If you deem it worthy, I may try to adapt it to GeoTools. Sounds interesting, but also seems to duplicate part of Batik work. This suggestion: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg04718.html seems to have more potential. Batik already has to turn the elements into shapes to paint them on Java2D, so a fake Graphics2D could be used to extract the generated shape if no other way is available (see the discussion about the ShapeNode class) Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
