Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: > Victor, > > my underlying problem with the current GeoServer stable branch pom > versioning convention is, why should a branch care if a tag has been > created? By using (for example) 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT, developers have a > completely unnecessary burden of having to update the branch whenever a > release tag is made. But that is the current convention. > > I checked and 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT is a valid identifier. > > This proposal is how Maven now works: > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Versioning > > Here is the old discussion, the last time I complained about it:
I'd prefer to just keep the poms in the branch unmodified as well, using 2.0-SNAPSHOT. One less moving part in the release process, and I fail to see the advantage of using something like 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT. Versioning wise it would be _great_ if the artifacts produced by the nightly build had, right in the middle of the GUI, a version number including the date of the build instead of generically 2.0-SNAPSHOT. But that is a different issue. Cheers Andrea -- Andrea Aime OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
