I would prefer keeping them separate. Simone. ------------------------------------------------------- Ing. Simone Giannecchini GeoSolutions S.A.S. Founder - Software Engineer Via Carignoni 51 55041 Camaiore (LU) Italy
phone: +39 0584983027 fax: +39 0584983027 mob: +39 333 8128928 http://www.geo-solutions.it http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/simonegiannecchini http://twitter.com/simogeo ------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 on the idea. And a question for discussion. Should we just bring the > module straight across? Or should we merge it into main where all the > catalog and config classes live? > > On 10-05-25 8:55 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: >> Hi, >> take this just as a question, but in general, how do you >> feel about moving the restconfig into core? >> >> From where I stand: >> - it has been used in a number of ways but many different users >> - has a very good test coverage >> - the most common thing that trips users trying restconfig out is >> that they don't get it's an extension -> they are surprised it is >> >> It seems to me it's a good candidate for inclusion into core. >> Afaik this will require a GSIP, but for the moment, let's just >> hear opinions :-) >> >> Cheers >> Andrea >> > > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enterprise support for open source geospatial. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
