On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> > wrote: >>> >>> Any objection? >> >> Nothing in particular here, just an observation. In the past we had >> complaints that OGR was not able to parse GeoJSON generated by >> GeoServer [1], it would be interesting to know what happens with this >> change > > Uh, and maybe another observation too. Ian started a thread about timezones > some > time ago, what happens timezone wise with this patch? > Also, I think some stores/parser can also generate Calendar objects, might > want to > handle those as well in the patch.
Thanks Andrea. So ogr2ogr seems happy. Run ogr2ogr -f GeoJSON out.json in.json on the attached in.json produces the attached out.json So granted there's no objection I'll prepare a patch that takes into account Calendar (with timezone) and proper unit tests for review. Cheers, Gabriel > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
