No I never did... it was something that fell off. Any chance we can just
point them at the GSIP? Not sure i have the time to interact with the
working group unfortunately.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Justin,
>
> did you submit your GSIP 61 findings to the OGC WFS/FES SWG? It has
> started meeting. The web form is below (the link provided by Simon). I am
> sure the group will appreciate your input.
>
> I am an observer on the SWG. I have raised the startIndex issue (clarify
> zero or one-based index).
>
> Kind regards,
> Ben.
>
>
> On 26/10/11 14:43, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>
>> That would be great!
>>
>> On 26/10/11 14:10, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>
>>> Sure I will try to gather my thoughts on this... at a client site this
>>> week so might not be until end of week.
>>>
>>
>>
> On 25/10/11 15:35, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>>
>>>> If you have time to submit a couple of bullet points and a link to your
>>>> GSIP 61 page on the OGC web form below, you will ensure that the OGC SWG
>>>> are at least aware of your findings as the principal implementer of
>>>> GeoServer WFS 2.0. I suspect that they will find your work most useful.
>>>>
>>>> If you lack the time and are willing to risk my misinterpretation,
>>>> please let me know and I will submit your findings on behalf of the
>>>> project.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>> Ben.
>>>>
>>>> On 25/10/11 15:26, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Similar issues have been brought up on the wfs-dev list I believe...
>>>>> and the spec writers have been open to amending them. There is also a
>>>>> constraint in the capabilities document in which one can declare
>>>>> whether paging is transaction safe... and we set that to false... so
>>>>> perhaps the spec is poorly worded perhaps. Regardless though it seems
>>>>> pointless if all the legitimate implementations of wfs 2.0 don't
>>>>> implement it.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:15 AM, Ben
>>>>> Caradoc-Davies<Ben.Caradoc-**[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Justin, perhaps you could submit a WFS 2 change request to encourage
>>>>> OGC to change the spec to what you were able to reasonably implement?
>>>>> :-D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: RE: GeoServer WFS 2.0 limitations
>>>>> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 17:39:58 +0800
>>>>> From: Simon Cox
>>>>>
>>>>> Submit a WFS 2.0 Change Request to explicitly relax this requirement.
>>>>> https://portal.opengeospatial.**org/public_ogc/change_request.**php<https://portal.opengeospatial.org/public_ogc/change_request.php>
>>>>> It's just a web form.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Ben Caradoc-Davies
>>>>> Sent: Monday, 24 October 2011 4:56 PM
>>>>> To: Simon Cox
>>>>> Subject: GeoServer WFS 2.0 limitations
>>>>>
>>>>> FYI
>>>>>
>>>>> http://geoserver.org/display/**GEOS/GSIP+61+-+WFS+2.0<http://geoserver.org/display/GEOS/GSIP+61+-+WFS+2.0>
>>>>> "WFS 2.0 adds the ability to page results of a GetFeature request via
>>>>> the startIndex and maxFeatures parameters. The WFS specification
>>>>> actually implies that a service must maintain consistent paging results
>>>>> in the light of transactions, but such a restriction is very difficult
>>>>> to implement and implies that the server be able to store large results
>>>>> in memory, or maintain database transactions between requests which
>>>>> goes
>>>>> against the stateless nature of WFS all together. For this reason we
>>>>> ignore this requirement in our implementation."
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ben Caradoc-Davies<Ben.Caradoc-**[email protected]>
>>>>> Software Engineer
>>>>> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
>>>>> Australian Resources Research Centre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Justin Deoliveira
>>>>> OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>>>>> Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
>>>>>
>>>>
> --
> Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
> Software Engineer
> CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
> Australian Resources Research Centre
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Enterprise support for open source geospatial.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
