Gah, I was sure 2.1.x was pegged to an RC, didn't remember it was back on
1.3-SNAPSHOT.
Fix coming asap, sorry about the breakage.
Gabriel
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Andrea Aime
<[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Hudson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> See <http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-2.1.x/615/changes>
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> [aaime] [GEOS-4958] GetFeatureInfo and Getfeature will fail for
>> shapefiles and directory of shapefiles configured in a workspace other than
>> the default one
>>
>
>
>> [INFO] Compilation failure
>> <
>> http://hudson.opengeo.org/hudson/job/geoserver-2.1.x/ws/geoserver-2.1.x/gwc/src/main/java/org/geoserver/gwc/layer/CatalogConfiguration.java>:[57,7]
>> org.geoserver.gwc.layer.CatalogConfiguration is not abstract and does not
>> override abstract method addLayer(org.geowebcache.layer.TileLayer) in
>> org.geowebcache.config.Configuration
>>
>>
> Hmmm... my commit was not GWC related, either directly or indirectly as
> far as I can see,
> the above makes me think a GWC base class changed and this build is the
> first time that shows up?
> Trunk was not affected, maybe we're one backport short?
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
--
Gabriel Roldan
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel