> > What I will do is try to articulate without ambiguity the current stance
> > and expectations from our side. We are in no way shape or form targeting
> > the 2.2.x branch with this work. Our only goal at this point is to gather
> > feedback from the community about the new api, which is currently happening
> > and that is great. Once discussion ramps down and we have settled on what
> > the initial api can look like we would like to start working toward
> > committing it to whatever the suitable unstable branch is at that time,
> > 2.3.x, 2.4.x, etc...
> >
>
>
>
>
> Hopefully we're not that far away, betting my money on 2.3.x
I agree - while I did not grind through the patch (way to go Andrea) I also did
not react quite as strongly the duplication involved in the predicate data
structures.
I have had experience using the GeoTools filter support with normal POJOs so I
know it works reasonably well. I agree that the ECQL utility class helps with
test case readability if that really is a driving factor.
Jody
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
