Hi Victor, I resolved GEOS-5101, the changes are already committed .
Concerning GEOS-5155, we will defer this to a later release. Since CAS is a
Single Sign-On solution we will have to change something on GUI, I will
discuss this with Justin.
No problems from my side.
2012/6/21 <[email protected]>
> Hi Christian,****
>
> ** **
>
> The 2 jira issue are still opened but I can see your commit from 2 days
> ago. There are also no mention on the comments in the Jira so I am unsure
> if your patch is completed ****
>
> ** **
>
> https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5155****
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOS-5101****
>
> ** **
>
> I will go with it has been completed because****
>
> ** **
>
> **· **The commit was performed on Monday J****
>
> **· **No reason to break up your commit into smaller chunk for
> svn for a single issue****
>
> **· **Everyone was well informed about the release today
> (Thursday)****
>
> ** **
>
> I will wait 30 minutes for any replies and hopefully you can stop me in
> time if otherwise J ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Andrea Aime [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, 18 June 2012 11:25 PM
> *To:* Justin Deoliveira
> *Cc:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Geoserver-devel] Big security patch before RC****
>
> ** **
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Justin Deoliveira <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> You certainly are persistent Christian. While it still goes against my
> better judgement I am inclined to let these changes in. The main reasons
> being:****
>
> ** **
>
> * our policy has always been fuzzy on this and GSIP 77 has not yet become
> official, so we have no hard and fast rule****
>
> * Victor has stated the release is being pushed back a few days until
> Thursday****
>
> ** **
>
> So if the other PSC members consent I would say go ahead for now. ****
>
> ** **
>
> Works for me****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> But please note that this will really be the only exception to this rule.
> I believe Andrea is going to be updating the GSIP 77 proposal to be clearer
> about this. But after the proposal lands there will be no exceptions like
> this. If the developer doesn't have things in order before hitting the
> stable deadline then its too bad. They must wait no matter how inconvenient
> it will be for them.****
>
> ** **
>
> Yep, either a work committed in the "green zone" is complete by the time
> we release a RC or we should roll it back somehow****
>
> (at least, for stuff that can be rolled back).****
>
> Will update the proposal also to make sure the PSC uses extra attention to
> resourcing and to the likelyness that a proposal****
>
> gets completed in time (one immediate consequence, unlikely to get large
> proposals in a week before the hardening starts)****
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers****
>
> Andrea****
>
> ****
>
> --
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> GeoSolutions S.A.S.
> Tech lead
>
> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
> 55054 Massarosa (LU)
> Italy
>
> phone: +39 0584 962313
> fax: +39 0584 962313
> mob: +39 339 8844549
>
> http://www.geo-solutions.it
> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/
> http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime
> http://twitter.com/geowolf****
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
