So Niels would you like people to review and vote on this now?
--
Jody Garnett
On 14 January 2016 at 08:38, Niels Charlier <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've changed the proposal. I will research the HEAD proposal, but I'll
> support ?metadata anyway (as it is extendible)
>
> Regards
> Niels
>
>
> On 14-01-16 00:03, Jody Garnett wrote:
>
> Correct, and tricky - wonder if our rest library supports that :)
>
> Still human navigable html output our Json is not a bad thing.
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 3:02 PM Robert Coup <
> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 13 January 2016 at 22:48, Jody Garnett <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Agreed, I see the limitations - what do you think of Kevin's idea of
>>> using a query string and avoid a parallel tree for metadata?
>>>
>>
>> Isn't that what HEAD requests are for? And return the metadata in headers?
>>
>> HEAD /resource/path/to/directory
>> > Last-Modified: <timestamp>
>> > Content-Type: application/x-directory
>>
>> HEAD /resource/path/to/directory/file.png
>> > ETag: <md5 hash>
>> > Content-Length: 12345
>> > Last-Modified: <timestamp>
>> > Content-Type: image/png
>>
>> Rob :)
>>
> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance
APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month
Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now
Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
