Andrea,

this proposal is (almost) entirely confined to one module 
(gs-netcdf-out), changes no API, is (almost) fully backwards compatible 
in behaviour, and is fully backwards compatible in serialised settings. 
The GSIP might not even be required, but I thought it a useful way to 
ask for comments. I do not expect it to be contentious; I welcome all 
feedback.

There was some prior discussion on GeoTools PR #1417 
<https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1417> which was most helpful 
in dissuading me from that approach, and I also got an off-list analysis 
of the cost of opening NetCDF/GRIB files (I have asked for permission to 
copy it as a Jira comment).

I agree that there was no response to my original proposal, perhaps 
because of the REST migration sprint, and perhaps because a module 
maintainer was on leave. The only feedback I got on this one was your 
comment on GEOT-5709 (thanks!). I hope that the screenshot, user manual 
section, and fully implemented pull requests will attract more attention.

Kind regards,
Ben.

On 25/04/17 18:44, Andrea Aime wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> I've lost track of this one, seems like a step was skipped?
> No big deal, but checking the history I see GSIP-158 switching from
> a "preliminary discussion" thread (unfortunately empty) to a pull
> request without a vote in the middle.
>
> Have I missed it?
>
> No big deal, we can vote and review at the same time.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I have submitted pull requests for review.
>>
>> See the GSIP 158 page for screenshot and user manual:
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
>>
>> A small change is required to GeoTools:
>>
>> [GEOT-5709] Support coverage property SourceUrl
>> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/1564
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-5709
>>
>> Most of the implementation is in GeoServer:
>>
>> [GEOS-8099] GSIP 158 - NetCDF output support for variable attributes and
>> extra variables
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/2281
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-8099
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Ben.
>>
>> On 25/03/17 17:15, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>> I have added some GitHub branch comparisons in the implementation
>>> section. The implementation is incomplete; discussion comes first. It is
>>> still too early for pull requests.
>>>
>>> On 25/03/17 16:59, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
>>>> Preliminary GSIP for discussion, no Jira issues yet:
>>>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/GSIP-158
>>
>> --
>> Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
>> Director
>> Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
>> New Zealand
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Ben Caradoc-Davies <[email protected]>
Director
Transient Software Limited <http://transient.nz/>
New Zealand

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel

Reply via email to