On 2021-08-19 1:13 a.m., Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 6:11 PM Ian Turton <ijtur...@gmail.com > <mailto:ijtur...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > It would be nice to see the back of 900913 finally - or at least > deprecate it and/or only allow people to switch it on using a flag? > > > Yeah, that joke has been running for too long. I don't know GWC enough > to prepare a plan for a seamless upgrade path though (and my scope is > currently limited to adding the standard gridsets). > People upgrading old data dirs should get a GeoServer that runs as > usual. About not having 900913 at all, not 100% sure, I'd need some > feedback about assumptions > that might be lying out there... Mapstore, GeoNode, Georchestra, > others... I'm going to guess they all rely on 900913 for the sole > reason it was there already.
I've been wanting to add a capability for gridset aliases to GWC for a while but haven't had time. That would allow for a smooth upgrade path that maintains backward compatibility. It could also be leveraged for protocols that have well known gridsets under different names. Ideally it would also be able to convert between gridsets that differ only in how their levels are numbered such as TMS's global-deodetic and WMTS's GoogleCRS84Quad -- Kevin Smith smit...@draconic.ca
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
