I would just go against the geotools process api directly. The resulting code should be easier to understand and maintain. -- Jody Garnett
On Wed, 24 Aug 2022 at 10:36, Johannes Weskamm <wesk...@terrestris.de> wrote: > Hi List, > > > I know that OGC API Processes ist not yet implemented in GeoServer via > the OGC API Extension. > > But as WPS and Processes are very similar and guessing that the > Processes implementation will happen at some point in the future and > GeoServer already has lots of useful WPS Processes, what about having a > wrapper or binding that translates the RESTful syntax of OGC API to the > WPS syntax? > > That way all the exisiting processes could be used without rewriting / > adaptions. > > Is this something that has been talked / thought about yet? > > > Greets, > > Johannes > > > > _______________________________________________ > Geoserver-devel mailing list > Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel >
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-devel mailing list Geoserver-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel
