> Yes, the format is the same, but the .qix files generated by GeoServer > should be smaller and perform somewhat better > (we have a few heuristics to get a small but effective index, avoid > isolated laves with single records and the like). > A recent version of uDig will generate the same .qix file as GeoServer > though
Hi Andrea, Your remark aroused my curiosity. I have indeed identified a small addition in the geotools port of shapelib's shptree.c that must explain that optimization and adapted it to shptree.c. I've not verified however if the geotools .qix and shapelib .qix are now identical, but I've seen that the new code path is triggered in some conditions. See http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/ticket/4472 for the patch. Best regards, Even ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-dev2 _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
