Andrea, I was trying to load it with a 32bit JDK, not a 64bit one, without luck. I may try some more tommorow.
It would be interesting to benchmark the speed difference with a modern JVM. If it is still significantly quicker, I'll ping my Oracle contacts to see if I can get them to either release the old source code (doubtful), or at least build a new version of the libraries. There must be someone within Oracle that still cares - I hope. Bryan -----Original Message----- From: andrea.a...@gmail.com [mailto:andrea.a...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Andrea Aime Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 11:43 AM To: Charles Galpin Cc: Hall, Bryan D Civ USAF AFSPC 38 OSS/OSM; geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Geoserver-users] JAI on JDK 1.6 / Windows 2008 R2 On 4/13/12, Charles Galpin <cgal...@lhsw.com> wrote: > Do you know which is going to perform better? 32bit jdk with native JAI, or > the 64bit jdk without native JAI? Gut feeling I'd say 32 bit with native jai, hands down, but I never really measured Cheers Andrea
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second. Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You. Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE! http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
