Hello List, we've discovered a performance difference between WFS 1.0, WFS 1.1 and WFS 2.0 bbox queries. Thanks in advance for your hints.
Kind regards, Juergen Weichand ################## Config: ################## PostGIS DB which contains ~10.000.000 Multi-Polygons (Parcels) BBOX Query which returns 379.023 (simple) Features GeoServer 2.2.4 (also 2.3 b1) ################## Queries: ################## WFS 1.0 http://geoserv.weichand.de/tmp/GetFeature_10_BBOX.xml WFS 1.1 http://geoserv.weichand.de/tmp/GetFeature_11_BBOX.xml WFS 2.0 http://geoserv.weichand.de/tmp/GetFeature_20_BBOX.xml ################## Result: ################## (time to 1st response --> without downloading the stream) WFS 1.0 ------> HTTP-Status: 200 ------> Content-Type: text/xml; subtype=gml/2.1.2 ------> Time to 1st response: 662 ms WFS 1.1 ------> HTTP-Status: 200 ------> Content-Type: text/xml; subtype=gml/3.1.1 ------> Time to 1st response: 45337 ms WFS 2.0 ------> HTTP-Status: 200 ------> Content-Type: text/xml; subtype=gml/3.2 ------> Time to 1st response: 106447 ms Logs: http://geoserv.weichand.de/tmp/log.txt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013 and get the hardware for free! Learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb _______________________________________________ Geoserver-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
