On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Martin Davis <mtncl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I meant that the new mode would compute a cluster point for groups of
> features, but then return *each original feature* but having as geometry the
> computed cluster point.  So the GFI spatial filter would select all the
> features in the cluster, and would get back full attribution for each one of
> them.  (PointStacker reads all the features in the map window before
> outputting them, so it can choose to output any mixture of attributes and
> spatial required).

Ah, I see. Yeah, makes sense.

>>
>> A more compact solution would be to issue a polygon with the convex hull
>> of all the points used in the cluster, which could also be used in
>> GetFeature
>> to retrieve all the features and their attributes
>
>
> Interesting idea.  The clustering is based on a square grid, so it could
> just return the grid cell outline. But what query would retrieve this
> polygon?  The RT output is only available to the renderer, right?  So
> doesn't this mean that WPS would have to be used to call the PointStacker
> process directly?

Hum, no, you just have to do GFI in GML or JSON format, and you get
full attributes,
including the geometry.

Cheers
Andrea

-- 
==
Our support, Your Success! Visit http://opensdi.geo-solutions.it for
more information.
==

Ing. Andrea Aime
@geowolf
Technical Lead

GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Via Poggio alle Viti 1187
55054  Massarosa (LU)
Italy
phone: +39 0584 962313
fax: +39 0584 1660272
mob: +39  339 8844549

http://www.geo-solutions.it
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it

-------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to