There is another page here
<https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wfs/axis_order.html> that
provides a breakdown of axis order expectations protocol by protocol.
--
Jody Garnett


On Tue, 5 May 2020 at 14:43, Travis Brundage <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the clarification, that was indeed the issue. You are right,
> because my layer expects lon/lat order, where as Andrea points out, the WFS
> expects EPSG:4326 to be in lat/lon order - hence the confusion when I
> explicitly pass the CRS. Without explicitly passing the CRS parameter, I
> need to reorder the coordinates in my case to communicate it properly.
>
> Cheers,
> Travis
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:35 AM Andrea Aime <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:52 AM Travis Brundage <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The reference documentation
>>> <https://docs.geoserver.org/stable/en/user/filter/ecql_reference.html#spatial-predicate>
>>> says that it will default to the layer's defined CRS, though my guess is
>>> the WFS request is defaulting to the underlying geom's native CRS in
>>> PostGIS (which is different).
>>>
>>
>> Nope, not native, it's what we declare in the WFS capabilities. Which, if
>> you are using WFS 1.1 or 2.0, means 4326 in lat/lon order, since it uses a
>> URN.
>> This documentation page explains it better:
>> https://docs.geoserver.org/latest/en/user/services/wfs/axis_order.html
>>
>> Cheers
>> Andrea
>>
>> ==
>>
>> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit
>> http://goo.gl/it488V for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime @geowolf
>> Technical Lead GeoSolutions S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054 Massarosa
>> (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: +39 0584 1660272 mob: +39 339 8844549
>> http://www.geo-solutions.it http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>> ------------------------------------------------------- *Con riferimento
>> alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 -
>> Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si precisa che ogni
>> circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali
>> allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è riservata al/i solo/i
>> destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le è giunto per
>> errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione è illecita. Le
>> sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended
>> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
>> information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
>> disclosure. We remind that - as provided by European Regulation 2016/679
>> “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this e-mail or the information
>> herein by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
>> have received this email by mistake, please notify us immediately by
>> telephone or e-mail.*
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Geoserver-users mailing list
>
> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
> this list:
> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>
> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>
>
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to