Why I ask this is that I am trying to build a custom datastore which only 
require one parameter "url" to the path, and the path is a directory.


So the `ShapefileDirectoryDataStore` will be returned back  early.


Fine, I will tried to add a new Param for the factory and to see if this can be 
solved.




------------------ Original ------------------
From: &nbsp;"andrea.aime";<[email protected]&gt;;
Send time:&nbsp;Friday, Oct 16, 2020 5:05 PM
To:&nbsp;"Yang"<[email protected]&gt;; 
Cc:&nbsp;"geoserver-users"<[email protected]&gt;; 
Subject: &nbsp;Re: [Geoserver-users] why ResourcePool retrieve DataStore by 
parameters?



On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 10:52 AM Yang <[email protected]&gt; wrote:







Also, I wonder why it does not use the type of the DataStoreInfo to get the 
result directly?






Because we occasionally rewrite the datastores from the ground up, this has 
happened for all JDBC stores,
and for the WFS store for example. If the code was looking for a specific 
factory, the upgrade
from the old to the new generation of the store would not be transparent 
anymore (the old and new
share the same params, they are never in the classpath at the same time).


A situation where two stores share the same mandatory parameters is considered 
broken design,
core stores are set up not to share them (e.g., the JDBC store have a db_type 
parameter&nbsp;to tell them apart).


I guess the code could be looking for a well known factory first and fall back 
to parameters lookup
if it's not found, but we haven't had a need for that so far


Cheers
Andrea




== GeoServer Professional Services from the experts! Visit http://goo.gl/it488V 
for more information. == Ing. Andrea Aime  @geowolf Technical Lead GeoSolutions 
S.A.S. Via di Montramito 3/A 55054  Massarosa (LU) phone: +39 0584 962313 fax: 
+39 0584 1660272 mob: +39  339 8844549 http://www.geo-solutions.it 
http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it 
------------------------------------------------------- Con riferimento alla 
normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE 2016/679 - Regolamento 
generale sulla protezione dei dati ??GDPR??), si precisa che ogni circostanza 
inerente alla presente email (il suo contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) 
?? un dato la cui conoscenza ?? riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati 
dallo scrivente. Se il messaggio Le ?? giunto per errore, ?? tenuta/o a 
cancellarlo, ogni altra operazione ?? illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se 
potesse darmene notizia. This email is intended only for the person or entity 
to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, 
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as 
provided by European Regulation 2016/679 ??GDPR?? - copying, dissemination or 
use of this e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please 
notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to