Thank you Andrea,
I've just created a ticket  GEOS
<https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-10290>-
<https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-10290>10290
<https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOS-10290> attaching data and WFS
requests.

Stefano

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 9:48 AM Andrea Aime <
andrea.a...@geosolutionsgroup.com> wrote:

> This has been going on for a while, snowballing... a number of different
> developers
> have been providing patches during the last few years, each time adding
> tests, and each
> time apparently fixing something but breaking something else.
> It seems we did not have enough tests covering M and Z, and we still do
> not,
> despite the fair number of test methods in here:
>
> https://github.com/geotools/geotools/blob/main/modules/plugin/shapefile/src/test/java/org/geotools/data/shapefile/shp/ZMHandlersTest.java
>
> Please open a ticket, attach a sample shapefile along with requests that
> make the system fail.
> Hopefully it will be picked up during one of the future bug fix code
> sprints.
>
> Cheers
> Andrea
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:16 AM stefano pezzi <stefanope...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I'm experiencing problems querying with WFS's GetFeature layers based on
>> shapefile with geometry with more than 2 dimensions.
>>
>> My test environment:
>>
>>    - Windows 10, Tomcat 9.0.54, Java jdk-11.0.12.7-hotspot (Adoptium by
>>    Eclipse Foundation)
>>
>> My test data
>>
>>    - polygonal shapefile elaborated with ogr2ogr to produce 2D, 3D (xyz
>>    & xym) and 4D geometry (xyzm). The original shapefile was a 4D geometry
>>    coming from ESRI's applications.
>>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYZM  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYZM.shp
>>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYZ  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYZ.shp
>>       - ogr2ogr -dim XYM  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXYM.shp
>>       - ogr2ogr -dim XY  OrigEdificiXYZM.shp EdificiXY.shp
>>
>> My test query:
>>
>> http://localhost:8089/geoserver/wfs?service=WFS&version=2.0.0&request=GetFeature&typeName=common:EdificiXYM&bbox=493318,
>> 5048991, 493319, 5048992&srsName=EPSG:32632
>>
>> I launched with PostMan the WFS GetFeature with a bbox filter and I got
>> this results on different version of GeoServer:
>>
>> *GeoServer*
>>
>> *3D *(XYZ/XYM)
>>
>> *4D *(XYZM)
>>
>> *2D *(XY)
>>
>> 2.20.0
>>
>> O
>>
>> O
>>
>> ü
>>
>> 2.19.3
>>
>> O
>>
>> O
>>
>> ü
>>
>> 2.18.5
>>
>> O
>>
>> O
>>
>> ü
>>
>> 2.17.5
>>
>> O
>>
>> O
>>
>> ü
>>
>> 2.16.5
>>
>> ü
>>
>> ü
>>
>> ü
>>
>> 2.16.0
>>
>> ü
>>
>> ü
>>
>> ü
>>
>> The XYZM and XYZ test cases give the same error "*Invalid ordinate
>> index: 3." *
>> Excerpt from logfile:
>> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Invalid ordinate index: 3
>> at org.locationtech.jts.geom.Coordinate.setM(Coordinate.java:218)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.geom.impl.PackedCoordinateSequence.getCoordinate(PackedCoordinateSequence.java:116)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.checkIntersectionWithSegments(RectangleIntersects.java:327)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.checkIntersectionWithLineStrings(RectangleIntersects.java:317)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersectsSegmentVisitor.visit(RectangleIntersects.java:310)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.geom.util.ShortCircuitedGeometryVisitor.applyTo(ShortCircuitedGeometryVisitor.java:35)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersects.intersects(RectangleIntersects.java:110)
>> at
>> org.locationtech.jts.operation.predicate.RectangleIntersects.intersects(RectangleIntersects.java:58)
>> at org.locationtech.jts.geom.Geometry.intersects(Geometry.java:754)
>> at org.geotools.filter.spatial.BBOXImpl.basicEvaluate(BBOXImpl.java:118)
>> at
>> org.geotools.filter.spatial.BBOXImpl.evaluateInternal(BBOXImpl.java:107)
>> ....
>>
>> The XYM test case gives an  "*Index 69 out of bounds for length 69"*
>> Excerpt from logfile:
>> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index 69 out of bounds for
>> length 69
>> at
>> org.geotools.geometry.jts.LiteCoordinateSequence.setOrdinate(LiteCoordinateSequence.java:224)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.PolygonHandler.readCoordinates(PolygonHandler.java:315)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.PolygonHandler.read(PolygonHandler.java:142)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.shapefile.shp.ShapefileReader$Record.shape(ShapefileReader.java:114)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.shapefile.ShapefileFeatureReader.getGeometry(ShapefileFeatureReader.java:239)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.shapefile.IndexedShapefileFeatureReader.hasNext(IndexedShapefileFeatureReader.java:86)
>> at
>> org.geotools.data.ReTypeFeatureReader.hasNext(ReTypeFeatureReader.java:191)
>> at org.geotools.data.MaxFeatureReader.hasNext(MaxFeatureReader.java:82)
>> ...
>>
>> WMS GetMap *works fine* with all types of geometries.
>>
>> It's clearly a GeoTools error and though I found information about this
>> having been already solved (
>> https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6599) I'm still having
>> issues.
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geoserver-users mailing list
>>
>> Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to
>> this list:
>> - Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
>> http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
>> - The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
>> http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
>>
>> If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
>> https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
>>
>>
>> Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrea Aime
>
> ==
> GeoServer Professional Services from the experts!
>
> Visit http://bit.ly/gs-services-us for more information.
> ==
>
> Ing. Andrea Aime
> @geowolf
> Technical Lead
>
> GeoSolutions Group
> phone: +39 0584 962313
>
> fax:     +39 0584 1660272
>
> mob:   +39  333 8128928
>
> https://www.geosolutionsgroup.com/
>
> http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Con riferimento alla normativa sul trattamento dei dati personali (Reg. UE
> 2016/679 - Regolamento generale sulla protezione dei dati “GDPR”), si
> precisa che ogni circostanza inerente alla presente email (il suo
> contenuto, gli eventuali allegati, etc.) è un dato la cui conoscenza è
> riservata al/i solo/i destinatario/i indicati dallo scrivente. Se il
> messaggio Le è giunto per errore, è tenuta/o a cancellarlo, ogni altra
> operazione è illecita. Le sarei comunque grato se potesse darmene notizia.
>
> This email is intended only for the person or entity to which it is
> addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> otherwise protected from disclosure. We remind that - as provided by
> European Regulation 2016/679 “GDPR” - copying, dissemination or use of this
> e-mail or the information herein by anyone other than the intended
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please
> notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list

Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this 
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton: 
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines: 
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html

If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this: 
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer


Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users

Reply via email to