Yes:
PROJCS["NDFD",
GEOGCS["GCS_Unknown",
DATUM["unknown",
SPHEROID["Sphere",6371000,0]],
PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],
UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]]],
PROJECTION["Lambert_Conformal_Conic_2SP"],
PARAMETER["latitude_of_origin",25],
PARAMETER["central_meridian",-95],
PARAMETER["standard_parallel_1",25],
PARAMETER["standard_parallel_2",25],
PARAMETER["false_easting",0],
PARAMETER["false_northing",0],
UNIT["metre",1,
AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],
AXIS["Easting",EAST],
AXIS["Northing",NORTH]]
+proj=lcc +lat_0=25 +lon_0=-95 +lat_1=25 +lat_2=25 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +R=6371000
+units=m +no_defs
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 5:38 AM Rahkonen Jukka <
jukka.rahko...@maanmittauslaitos.fi> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> You are using some custom CRS in Geoserver, EPSG:45557. Could you add the
> WKT that you have used for configuring it?
>
>
>
> -Jukka Rahkonen-
>
>
>
> *Lähettäjä:* Alexander Petkov <green...@gmail.com>
> *Lähetetty:* maanantai 30. tammikuuta 2023 14.09
> *Vastaanottaja:* geoserver-users <geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> *Aihe:* Re: [Geoserver-users] Geotiff in LCC shifted after WMS GetMap
> request
>
>
>
> I upgraded to 2.22.1 (latest at the time of writing).
>
>
>
> The problem with the systematic shift of layers in LCC projection
> persists.
>
>
>
> Steps taken to reproduce:
>
> 1. Rasterize the states layer (I used the VectorToRaster WPS).
>
> 2. Reproject to Lambert Conformal Conic:
>
> gdalwarp -ts 2145 1377 -t_srs '+proj=lcc +lat_0=25 +lon_0=-95 +lat_1=25
> +lat_2=25 +x_0=0 +y_0=0 +R=6371000 +units=m +no_defs' states_4326.tif
> states_45557.tif
>
> 3. Configure the reprojected raster as a Geotiff store.
>
> 4. Make a getMap request:
>
>
> https://wfas.firenet.gov/geoserver/osm/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=osm%3Astates_45557,osm:states&bbox=-2973344.8603333654%2C-4525.983623652253%2C2805742.5427372716%2C3061083.104743568&width=768&height=407&srs=EPSG%3A45557&styles=&format=application/openlayers
> <https://eur06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwfas.firenet.gov%2Fgeoserver%2Fosm%2Fwms%3Fservice%3DWMS%26version%3D1.1.0%26request%3DGetMap%26layers%3Dosm%253Astates_45557%2Cosm%3Astates%26bbox%3D-2973344.8603333654%252C-4525.983623652253%252C2805742.5427372716%252C3061083.104743568%26width%3D768%26height%3D407%26srs%3DEPSG%253A45557%26styles%3D%26format%3Dapplication%2Fopenlayers&data=05%7C01%7Cjukka.rahkonen%40maanmittauslaitos.fi%7C7f7ad617f40f4cc0971608db02bbc084%7Cc4f8a63255804a1c92371d5a571b71fa%7C0%7C1%7C638106777639503897%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JK%2B38OSMDa9GgciJuyOmNkJyaE4lrtsfGrtQfGXc7fg%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Upon zoom/pan around the misalignment of the data is visible.
>
>
>
> 5. Import states_45557.tif as a layer in QGis, and add the WMS layer from
> Step 3. The misalignment is visible in the attached screenshot.
>
>
>
> I believe this problem occurs when making a WMS request. If the layers is
> exported wia WCS, it displays fine in QGis.
>
>
>
> What advice would you give me to rectify this issue?
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 12:54 AM Alexander Petkov <green...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I noticed that the misalignment I described above (about a year ago) is
> also present in other coverage layers in Lambert Conformal Conic:
>
>
> https://wfas.firenet.gov/geoserver/wms?service=WMS&version=1.1.0&request=GetMap&layers=ndfd%3ATemperature,osm:states&bbox=-2764561.134059207%2C-265067.6408074065%2C2683272.815316402%2C3232213.174246306&width=768&height=493&srs=EPSG%3A45558&styles=&format=application/openlayers
> <https://eur06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwfas.firenet.gov%2Fgeoserver%2Fwms%3Fservice%3DWMS%26version%3D1.1.0%26request%3DGetMap%26layers%3Dndfd%253ATemperature%2Cosm%3Astates%26bbox%3D-2764561.134059207%252C-265067.6408074065%252C2683272.815316402%252C3232213.174246306%26width%3D768%26height%3D493%26srs%3DEPSG%253A45558%26styles%3D%26format%3Dapplication%2Fopenlayers&data=05%7C01%7Cjukka.rahkonen%40maanmittauslaitos.fi%7C7f7ad617f40f4cc0971608db02bbc084%7Cc4f8a63255804a1c92371d5a571b71fa%7C0%7C1%7C638106777639660142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=orvwmwUSSKzxUriIFZZCWsEb31P%2FlzZrvjONvQWfXSU%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> The Geoserver release used is 2.18.5.
>
> I guess a good first step would be to upgrade to latest and test again?
> Has anyone noticed this?
>
>
>
> TIA,
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 6:07 AM Alexander Petkov <green...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I have time series data in Geotiff format, which appears shifted after a
> WMS GetMap request.
>
>
>
> The data is in Lambert Conformal Conic projection:
>
> https://spatialreference.org/ref/sr-org/6825/
> <https://eur06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fspatialreference.org%2Fref%2Fsr-org%2F6825%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cjukka.rahkonen%40maanmittauslaitos.fi%7C7f7ad617f40f4cc0971608db02bbc084%7Cc4f8a63255804a1c92371d5a571b71fa%7C0%7C1%7C638106777639660142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=TI5Otxc7lqtG4%2BtnAGofpmBMIj4VeXpGXuZRJdAqSWo%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> When the raster is overlaid with the states shapefile, the misalignment
> becomes apparent (zoom to the upper boundary of the shapefile):
>
>
>
>
> https://aws.wfas.net/geoserver//wms?service=WMS&version=1.3.0&request=GetMap&layers=test%3Afbx_20210822,osm:states&bbox=-2764474.351%2C-265059.31999999983%2C2683188.584%2C3232111.711&width=768&height=493&srs=EPSG%3A45557&styles=&format=application/openlayers
> <https://eur06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faws.wfas.net%2Fgeoserver%2F%2Fwms%3Fservice%3DWMS%26version%3D1.3.0%26request%3DGetMap%26layers%3Dtest%253Afbx_20210822%2Cosm%3Astates%26bbox%3D-2764474.351%252C-265059.31999999983%252C2683188.584%252C3232111.711%26width%3D768%26height%3D493%26srs%3DEPSG%253A45557%26styles%3D%26format%3Dapplication%2Fopenlayers&data=05%7C01%7Cjukka.rahkonen%40maanmittauslaitos.fi%7C7f7ad617f40f4cc0971608db02bbc084%7Cc4f8a63255804a1c92371d5a571b71fa%7C0%7C1%7C638106777639660142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ksg7KM7sr%2FrGh7VJaB3M5tnyf7ZHmCP0Po7Kuk8cS7M%3D&reserved=0>
>
> Here is a zoomed version captured to illustrate the problem:
>
> https://ibb.co/ZzjTjXS
> <https://eur06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fibb.co%2FZzjTjXS&data=05%7C01%7Cjukka.rahkonen%40maanmittauslaitos.fi%7C7f7ad617f40f4cc0971608db02bbc084%7Cc4f8a63255804a1c92371d5a571b71fa%7C0%7C1%7C638106777639660142%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=MoL3TCm0JLaowjgzA%2Fs%2BfRJjwMzFsoLJU%2BdlKVnwzs4%3D&reserved=0>
>
> WCS GetCoverage request serves the data without this shift.
>
> Any ideas about correcting this?
>
> Thanks in advance!!
>
> Alex
>
>
_______________________________________________
Geoserver-users mailing list
Please make sure you read the following two resources before posting to this
list:
- Earning your support instead of buying it, but Ian Turton:
http://www.ianturton.com/talks/foss4g.html#/
- The GeoServer user list posting guidelines:
http://geoserver.org/comm/userlist-guidelines.html
If you want to request a feature or an improvement, also see this:
https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/wiki/Successfully-requesting-and-integrating-new-features-and-improvements-in-GeoServer
Geoserver-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-users
