Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
After a very, very, very long wait (much more delay than expected), I
would like to slowly start the port of J2D renderer as a GO-1
implementation (or at least try to do).
Hi Martin, it has been too long since we worked together. In the spirit
of your recent Go-1 post cory and I are are going to create the stylish
branch.
The plan is as described in those articles you commented on, I am going
to try things out as separate interfaces.
There are 4 things on the table:
- the SLD 1.0 spec
- the GeoTools styling implementation
- the GeoAPI interfaces
- the plan of using different interfaces to capture different subsets of
the styling problem (with some of the subsets being "standard")
The idea will be:
- use GeoAPI "ripped" interfaces to capture SLD 1.0 (can this be done or
is that not their target?)
- create GeoTools interfaces as the superset of SLD 1.0 and the
experiments that are going on
- use the GeoTools implementations behind both, in cases were different
communities chose different we can map from one to the other
As an example of this last point GeoAPI uses java Font objects, while
GeoTools sticks with the CSS entires used to define a Font. If possible
we will use GeoAPI interfaces unmolested, but I suspect we will end up
differing on matters of Geometry and Feature.
Cheers,
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today
Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam
for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit:
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7628&alloc_id=16845&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
