Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
I don't much mind - I think someone (Martin Perhaps, needs to kick
out custom implementations of everything and may prefer interfaces).
I don't mind neither as long as the interfaces or abstract classes
live in Geotools. If they were going in GeoAPI, I would prefer
interfaces since some developpers outside Geotools have asked very
strongly for implementation freedom. But in the Geotools's API module,
abstract classes are just as fine for me.
There we have it :-)
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
