Justin Deoliveira wrote:
Hi all,
Porting over the data module to FM, I am having a bit of difficulty
porting over classes in the org.geootols.data.crs package. I was
hoping that the author(s) (Jody,Andrea) would be available for a code
review at some point.
I assume the problem was making derived or "sub" feature types, Chris
Holmes had a comment some months a go that I think we should consider
following. That is leave the FeatureType well enough alone - and just
return the Features as requested - they will not be valid against the
FeatureType metadata but what the heck.
Of course this really breaks down for the two reprojection cases you
mentioned ... does a GeometryAttribute have any way of indicating the
CRS? If so can you use it to indicate the resulting CRS after a "force"
or "reproject" has occurred?
Jody
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
