On 5/20/06, Jody Garnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse Eichar wrote:
> Hi Simone,
>
> I'm in agreement that this issue needs to be resolved. The problem is
> that I'm not 100% sure how to solve the problem. Do you have a
> suggestion? I apologize if you have put you suggestion in this email,
> I must have missed it.
If I can be so bold, here is the solution I was aiming for:
1. trust the CRS to be correct when looking at features data or
rendering etc...
Sure, although at the moment we work to agree on what is "correct".
2. allow the user to specify the CRS unambiguously - produce the two
needed authority factories so they can do this:
- "EPSG:4326" means "wms style", in the ordinate order ready to draw on
the screen (x first, y second)
I am in agreement here. A lot of mapping applications expect
longitude first, latitude second, leading us to think in terms of
intuitive x,y order (not lat/lon).
Alex
Rȧ�:&q�[���y�hv����^y�h��i��py� ���z� r���!���n}�h�ꮉ�%����ފ{^���y�^r薈2����쨺��m欉�ã
塧HŞm*az����bq�b�t�����]5m� v����!xg��x��m���zV���ږF�����\�
