Hi folks,
I would imagine that this will be a topic of discussion at tonights IRC
meeting. I know Martin came up with someone but there seems to be more
to this issue.
Could someone please summarize so that poor souls like myself can follow
at tonights meeting.
Thanks.
-Justin
Simone Giannecchini wrote:
That would be good for me as long as I do not get the "modified axis"
metadata but the EPSG plain name. Since the registration has a system
wide effect it should not clash with anything else.
I hope I made my point clearly.
Simone.
On 5/29/06, Martin Desruisseaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simone Giannecchini a écrit :
> I would like to expose some thougths about the proposed solution.
> [...snip...]
OrderedAxisAuthorityFactory is not going to be removed. Even with the
Hint proposal, it still the
class performing the work under the hood, so this class is there to
stay. The
OrderedAxisAuthorityFactory.register("EPSG") method is not removed
neither; it is just deprecated in
favor of the case-by-case approach. We may undeprecate this particular
method if it appears that it
is going to stay there for a while.
Martin.
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid7521&bid$8729&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
