Adrian Custer wrote: > Thanks Andrea, > FeatureTypes... did indeed clean up the deprecation. > > To everyone, > We need to have a meta discussion about factories, not just for > features but to bring the referencing factories inline and have a > standard policy. I have had this discussion, and cleaning up factories is most of what is slowing us down on the FM branch :-( Making the decision and getting it accomplished seems to be the problem, the FM branch is trying so hard on the accomplishing side ... please help!
> THIS IS TRUE EVEN IF THE ULTIMATE NIRVANA IS > CONTAINERS. We have a bad tendency to create a mess and leave it in > place because the "real" resolution is down the line. > Containers (like builders) have nothing really to do with it (aka they are both ways to make factories appear easier to use by reducing the amount of code needed to use them)... Factory - create methods that produce exactly what they say (no logic) Builder - reduce code by maintaining state that is used accross calls to Factory.create Container - reduce code by automatically calling all the Factory.setFactoryXXXX(...) methods Lets take up this topic in tonights meeting, Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
