Martin Desruisseaux wrote: > Jody Garnett a écrit : >> I have been having a few tough talks about geotools quality later >> (with how shall we say, concerned investors). I am +1 for the >> creation of the new module, however I would like to lock down >> conformance to our developers guide before the module is included in >> the nightly builds or release process. Specifically I would like to >> ensure we as a community offer you a code review (perhaps via IRC >> session late some night?), and that test coverage is met. > > Would the following approach fit? > > * Add a plugin/epsg-ext module on trunk, but do not include it in the > plugin/pom.xml yet. Yes, exactly so. > * Wait for PMC okay before to add the <module>epsg-ext</module> line > in plugin/pom.xml. Lets wait for you the module maintainer to say it is ready, ie has test case coverage of greater then 60%, and has gotten a code review/feedback from someone. Oh wait should probably add providence review to the list as well :-)
But yeah, that approach is a good fit. Jody ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
