The problem with that solution is that our Developers Guides says  
that a Module Maintainer has 3 days to respond to the patch before  
another committer can apply the change.  This solution would make  
that impossible... Unless that is what people actually want.  I  
suppose we could vote on it.

Jesse



On 26-Sep-06, at 11:49 AM, Paul Ramsey wrote:

> I can provide a programmatic fix to this problem, if you like, and  
> that is to turn on directory restrictions in SVN, and only provide  
> write access in modules to the maintainers.  That way a true patch- 
> queue would be enforced.  However, it would potentially cause huge  
> bottlenecks where inactive module maintainers exist/come into  
> being.  This is sort of what PgSQL does, all the patches come  
> through Bruce Momjian who maintains the patch queue, but he does  
> that full-time, while our module maintainers disappear regularly  
> and unpredictably.
>
> P
>
> On 26-Sep-06, at 11:46 AM, Jesse Eichar wrote:
>
>> During a talk I had with Justin we decided that a good policy for
>> collaboration on a module (assuming all module maintainer agrees to
>> this level of collaboration) is:
>>
>> 1.  Create a JIRA (make sure to assign it to Module maintainer)
>> 2.  Create a patch and attach it to the JIRA
>> 3.
>>      a) Module maintainer says "Go" then you can commit
>>      b) Module maintainer is silent for 3 days then you can commit
>>      c) Module maintainer provides a suggestion then make the suggested
>> change and start over at step 2
>>
>>
>> On 25-Sep-06, at 6:37 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry for the late reply, but this commit already went through I
>>> take it.
>>> I was hoping to get a chance to review it first. With Chris
>>> bringing up
>>> policy, I am having some issues with commit and ask questions later
>>> style
>>> we seem to have adopted.
>>>
>>> One thing I would like to ask is that before any more  
>>> improvements are
>>> made the results of my last code review are addressed. I have
>>> brought this
>>> up but the problem still persists. It is the issue with  
>>> JDBCDataStore
>>> modifying the passed in query object in getFeaturerReader.
>>
>> This is a small error, the Query should not be changed it place a
>> copy should be made and the new copy should be
>> modified.  Is there a JIRA for this issue?
>>
>>>
>>> As module maintainer I would like to fix this, but since it has to
>>> do with
>>> the filter splitting changes that were introduced, and I dont
>>> really know
>>> that code, I dont feel comfortable doing so. Which begs the
>>> question why
>>> am I the module maintainer if a) I am not he most active developer
>>> and b)
>>> i am completley unfamiliar with major parts of the code in my  
>>> module.
>>>
>>> -Justin
>>>
>>> On Sun, September 24, 2006 12:07 am, Chris Holmes wrote:
>>>> Cool, just did a quick code review, and things look pretty good.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> One big thing missing though is parallel commits to trunk.  We've
>>>> been
>>>> bad at this, and it wasn't something we talked about in
>>>> switzerland - how
>>>> to make sure we don't miss all kinds of bugs when we upgrade
>>>> stable. We
>>>> should get some kind of policy in place, but I thought I'd bring
>>>> it up.
>>>>
>>>> best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cory Horner wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Howdy,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been doing a little bit of PostGIS QA this week, as a few
>>>>> wriggling bugs still live on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes include:
>>>>> - exposing the ConnectionPool (this is mostly so tests may  
>>>>> obtain a
>>>>> connection and create tables) - PostgisDBInfo object (encapsulated
>>>>> version info -- since several methods were asking postgis what
>>>>> version
>>>>> it was, and it is better to just ask once) - expanded PostgisTests
>>>>> utility - GEOT-948: JDBC1DataStore is thread safe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Stuff for the not-too-distant future
>>>>> - GEOT-950: the connection pool is NOT closed on shutdown --
>>>>> we'll do up
>>>>>  a quick hack for this in uDig in the meantime, but this needs  
>>>>> to be
>>>>> addressed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jesse and I hope to have a look at the  
>>>>> PostGISAutoIncrementFIDMapper
>>>>> (partial test case written) on monday, since non-serial primary  
>>>>> keys
>>>>> don't seem to work.
>>>>>
>>>>> After that is complete, it would be great if the Geoserver guys
>>>>> could
>>>>> run some cite tests...
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Cory.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------ 
>>>>> --
>>>>> ---
>>>>> --
>>>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>>>> share
>>>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys --
>>>>> and earn
>>>>> cash
>>>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
>>>>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVD
>>>>> EV
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Chris Holmes
>>>> The Open Planning Project
>>>> http://topp.openplans.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> !DSPAM:1004,451604b4224007731818748!
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>> --
>>>> ----
>>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>>> share
>>>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and
>>>> earn
>>>> cash
>>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
>>>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> !DSPAM:1004,451604b4224007731818748!
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> !DSPAM:1004,451604b4224007731818748!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to
>>> share your
>>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn
>>> cash
>>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?
>>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>> ----
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to  
>> share your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn  
>> cash
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php? 
>> page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geotools-devel mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to