Adrian Custer a écrit :
> As I understand things, we want geotools to be modular so that users can
> grab what they want and leave the rest. If this is true, then we want
> the LICENSE info in every jar so that even if users only grab one jar,
> they have all the relevant info. There is so little cost to adding the
> LICENSE to every jar that it seems like a reasonable strategy.
I agree that each module may have a different set of licenses. My proposal was
not to applies to same licenses to all modules. It was rather to provide the
license texts in a common directory (namely 'licenses'). Then, each module
would
only provide a list of *references* to the licenses they use. This approach
seem
to fit well in Maven, since there is a section in pom.xml file specially for
licenses, so we can list there the URLs (not the full texts) to the relevant
licenses for each module.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
