Adrian Custer a écrit : > As I understand it Simone is using the branch. uDig will port to it. > That will flesh out bugs. Those bugs can be addressed in 2.3.x releases > just as well as they could prior to 2.3.0. Are there active bug fixes > happening on 2.3.x? Is there any reason to hold back on that release? If > not I'd just assume get the release out so we can consider the branch > stable i.e. closed.
There is one open issue but I don't know if it affect anyone other than myself. As part of the coverage branch merge, we had one API change that doesn't went to the usual "deprecate - then remove" cycle: Object Coverage.evaluate(DirectPosition) as been modified to Set Coverage.evaluate(DirectPosition) with a different semantic. This change at least one application (namely http://seagis.sourceforge.net). It is not a big deal - I will try to update my application. But I have no idea if it break any application other than mine. I wanted to review the coverage branch merge, but never had the time to do that yet. Maybe I would like to suggest some changes after the review, which would put us again at risk of API changes in coverage stuff. So the question is: do we want to release Geotools anyway and tell the users that the coverage part may be less frozen than some other Geotools parts? Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel