Jody Garnett ha scritto: > In talking with Rob a couple of interesting points came up ... the > useful one is this. > > Adding an implementation of Feature that implements getVersion() is > exactly the kind of change 2.4 is trying to support. If we can reuse > Andrea's work as an acceptance test it will be of benefit.
As I stated, I cannot work on 2.4 because ows4 branch is just a WFS 1.1 implementation, not a Geoserver I can ask a use to try out. See my answer to Rob comments. > This kind of > thing (extending the content GeoTools can work with) is exactly the kind > of change that should not cause a ripple to the library, and instead we > are left with a workaround. Just for the sake of discussion and comprehension, how working on 2.4 would benefit my work, besides the obvious that the required changes should not go in a stable branch? I mean, even in 2.4 I would have to extend Feature and fix the GML handlers to handle the newly added version attribute. What other shiny new roads would the ongoing 2.4 work open for me? Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
