Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> A nice elegant solution, before I call it complete can I ask how we >> can handle "@gml:fid" into a call to FidMapper (I do not need a >> solution just to make sure you have thought ahead to how to handle >> this case). >> +0 (changed to +1 when I see a comment on how "@fid can be handled in >> the future) > Very good point. As written now this case will not be handled properly > because the propery expression cannot infer the information about the > fid directly from the type. So I guess the answer for now is if you > arent using a FidFilter, you are out of luck. > > Off the top of my head perhaps another solution would be to create a > new property accessor in the jdbc module, one that is aware of the > fidMapping stuff. When we call the extension point we can throw in the > necessary fidMapper as a hint. +1 (you are adding the above text to a comment right :-) )
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
