Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Jody Garnett ha scritto:

>>> Why, instead of simply returning a useless "Object", can't we return
>>> something that implements an interfaces that _looks like_ Feature type?
>>> Maybe something that can list all "simple" properties around, those that
>>> geotools is able to handle at the moment, and a default geometry.
>>> Or, as a second alternative, provide services that turn these object
>>> description into something that can be understood at the geotools
>>> api level without any external intervention?
>>>   
>> An implementation can do all these things, an implementation that is 
>> close is on the FM branch.
>>
>> Andrea GeoServer (and generating GML) is not my only concern here; I 
>> would like to open the door to rich content beyond our feature model. 
>> Since we have failed to produce one (and something like EMF seems to be 
>> taking over) it seems best to sit on the sidelines.
> 
> If we cannot "reflect", "inspect" at least the simple properties out
> of that Source thing, then I'm against having it around.
> It just adds confusion and provides little value imho.
> Of course it's a matter that the PMC should discuss, so if mine it's
> the only -1 with two vote sessions you can get away anyways.

Oh, to be more clear, what I'm really concerned about is to have two
separated paths in the code for handling Source and FeatureSource,
this is what I find totally unacceptable.

As for having the interfaces around with no duplicate code paths,
I'm not totally against, I still think they do add to the confusion
without provide any value, but at least they do not harm too much.

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to