[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/25/2007 09:44:40 AM:
> Jody Garnett wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I have watched commits filling up the unsupported geometry module with > > actual content, but have not heard anything on the email list (or IRC > > meeting lately). I also understand their is a Geometry branch going on > > ... (possibly with a different set of developers). > > > Here are the two places work is happening: > > Bryce is this you? > - http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/branches/jts-wrapper/ Yes, this is the JTS wrapper approach (code from SYS Technologies). No, I haven't been committing recently. I was in a truck bound for a government surplus warehouse. Renderers and Filters and such should be coded against GeoAPI interfaces. Unless each geometry implementation should also include a renderer and a filter implementation. That smells like bad karma tho. Bryce ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
