Thanks for the introductions Martin, feels like I have a whole new group 
of people to meet.

I am doing planning this week; my goal is to review the available 
implementations and decide which
one to support (see GeoTools supported module process). In an ideal 
world I would love to function
as a facilitator, and spend my time on QA and documentation.

And now for the difficult part - as a GeoTools PMC I *really* want to 
see both implementations go forward
(as this will keep implementors from making assumptions - forcing them 
to work against the GeoAPI interfaces).
On a pragmatic level I am being paid to make sure a implementation is 
available in GeoTools for the next release.

The decision on where I spend my time will be based after a code review, 
and talking with you all. I would strongly
prefer to do this on the public email list - so perhaps after these 
introductions we could move to geotools-devel?

Cheers,
Jody
> Hello all
>
> Congratulation to Sanjay, who just got his gratuation thesis! (I got the
> new from Prof. Roehrig).
>
> This is a funny timing, since we just had a talk yesterday in Geotools
> IRC about geometries. Jody would like the get a closer looks to the
> implementations around. There is currently two of them (as far as I
> know):
>
> * Wrappers around JTS library (2D and cartesian coordinate system only).
> * Native Java implementation by Sanjay, with additional work from the
>   team in Arles.
>
> In order to give a chance to Sanjay and Jody to look at the work from
> the student at Arles, I think that it would be help if we commit their
> work to Geotools SVN. Would it be okay for the Arles team? If yes, I can
> ask to the Geotools PMC to grant write access on the
> "geotools/modules/unsupported/geometry" directory to one representative
> of the Arles team. Sanjay still have write access too, so he can
> supervise the work if he wish.
>
> An alternative may be to send the modified classes to Sanjay or myself,
> so we can commit them. But when the development work is more extensive
> than just patch, it sometime easier to get the classes commited by the
> peoples who work on it. Since the geometry module is not yet part of the
> full Geotools build, hacking in this module still a "low risk" activity
> for now.
>
>       Martin
>
>
> P.S.: it is going to be important to stay in touch with every
> contributors (Sanjay, Roehrig, peoples from Arles...) in the next few
> months, for legal reason. Geotools is trying to get more organized,
> including on legal standing. Geotools is in the incubation process of
> OSGEO (http://www.osgeo.org/), which is dedicaced to Open Source GIS
> software. In the future, we may (not sure, we are still in discussion)
> ask to every Geotools contributors, for all modules (not just geometry),
> to sign some legal paper (copyright assignment or grant of license, I'm
> not very aware of current state of discussion) to OSGEO, with the
> garantee that the license will stay the OpenSource approved LGPL. The
> purpose is to get the code protected by a real legal entity on the
> behave of all contributors, a little bit like other fundations (Apache,
> Mozilla...). I will contact you again on this topic when I will have
> more details.
>
>
>   


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to