So I guess I am stuck casting to Geotools implementation version . Sigh, so close to being fully against geoapi interfaces.
Jody Garnett wrote: > Justin Deoliveira wrote: >> I agree Jody, this is a better design. But do we really need the new >> interface. And I don't mean can you think of hypothetical situations >> in which we could use it? I mean is there someone waiting on this >> issue and will be able to commit an implementation and use it within a >> few weeks. >> >> If the answer is no, I fear we are designing this for the sake of >> designing it. >> -Justin > So let's keep it in the bag for now; and set ourself a "pain level" - ie > if we start to see three hacks around the problem we should do the real > solution. > > Cheers, > Jody > > !DSPAM:1004,45c92269180471804284693! > -- Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] The Open Planning Project http://topp.openplans.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
