Martin Desruisseaux ha scritto: > It should be revision 24275 according > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1160 but I need to check to be > sure. The bug is related to interaction between different classes > (especially "ProjectedCRS" vs "Conversion"), so the fix was not in a > single place, but rather spread over maybe 10 files. A "svn merge" will > probably produces some conflicts. > > I can imagine a workaround to put in a single place on the 2.3 branch > that may work, at the risk of being too permisive (the fix on trunk > tries to be as accurate as possible). I don't know if "too permisive" > for the 2.3 branch will be a problem in practice... The idea is to > ignore the "Conversion" object in "ProjectedCRS", and compare > "Conversion.getMathTransform()" instead. It is build on the assumption > that we are unlikely to have 2 ProjectedCRS with different Conversion > but identical MathTransform.
Hum, agreed, math in different projections is, well, different (be it for fully different equations, or different parameters due to different reference meridiand/parallels). Seems to be a good compromise to me. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
