Martin Desruisseaux a écrit :
> Previous releases were of the form "2.2-M0". The numbering were changed to the
> "2.3.0-M0" form for 2.3 only, because it was the default numbering scheme for
> "maven release". If we abandon the "maven release" procedure, should we go
> back
> to a "2.4-M0" scheme?
Since nobody commented on this one, I assume that there is no objection against
"2.4-M0" version number. I will start the release shortly on this base. If there
is objections against "2.4-M0", it will still possible to rename as "2.4.0-M0"
after next IRC.
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
