Jody Garnett ha scritto: > I am going to start on the work now but will not commit until votes are > in. If you really want something changed let me know early :-) > - > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Provide+common+parsers+in+a+consistent+fashion
+1 on the package names Related to the code sample, having to use a parser that requires a ton of constructor parameters does not seems the best thing to me. Can we have a default constructor that uses default geometries and the like? I'm still unhappy about merging CQL into main, -0 from my point of view, for good reasons I believe: maintenance, the fact it's not really a replacement for filter factories (no id filter support, remember). Go on, but allow me to say "see, I told you it was bad" in six months time :-) Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
