That sounds like a good hint Andrea.... I didn't even know there was a new way. Which PostGIS class has a good example for me to look at?
Jesse On Sep 5, 2007, at 12:47 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Tim Englich ha scritto: >> Hello Jesse, >> that's the Problem. There is no test that fails. >> The WFSCapabilties were read. But the Process which determine >> which part of >> the Filter is PreFilter and which is PostFilter always say that it >> is all >> PostFilter. >> I take a look at the Algorithm which do that an I think that there >> are som >> Capabilities required which are not supported by >> WFSFilterCapabilities. >> Also when you have tests which do Requests whith Filter in it will >> work >> because the filtering work will be done at the client in the >> postprocess. > > I have a hunch.. may it be that wfs datastore declares the filter > capabilities only the old way (declaring old filter capabilities) > and not the new way (or vice versa, good datastores are declaring > filter capabilities both ways these days)? If so, no wonder no > filter gets encoded and everything ends up in the post filters > > Cheers > Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
