Jody Garnett ha scritto: > Rob Atkinson wrote: > >> On the Xpath front... >> fully implementing xpath seems an unecessary burden, but partial >> implementation has its issues. >> > That is why we are trying for *no* implemenation of xpath :-) > > Even the use of "Name" for look up is just a helper method, ... the same > as going through the attributes and find the one with the name you > want). Note we were using a strongly typed Name make this "search" > unambigous (as upposed to using a plain String). > Hem... I now realize that I've missed one important element in the review. Query. Whatever we do, the model should make us able to implement an efficient jdbc datastore mapping a complex features out of tables and gathered with a single outer join style query. The complex datastore that we have now in a branch seems to be more of a temporary solution for jdbc, and a long term solution only when trying to mix in data coming from different datastores (where an in memory join is nevertheless required).
I'll have a look at that tomorrow. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
