Chris Holmes ha scritto:
> Ok, I'm trying to get a handle on this issue.
> 
> One question, what's the objection to just using SFL4J ?
> 
> It seems to meet Justin's criteria of using a standard library, it'll 
> work with sfl4j/jetty ;) (for Andrea), and Martin likes it a lot better 
> than commons logging.
> 
> I imagine I just missed what the objection was, but I'm curious to hear it.

Oh, for an idea of how hard the switch might be have a look at
the differences between java logggin and commons logging:
http://www.slf4j.org/api/org/slf4j/Logger.html

(you'll notice that some cases aren't covered 1:1 by slf4j
either, thought probably it's possible to handle them by using
that Marker thing they have there).

Cheers
Andrea

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Reply via email to