Sounds good to me. Updated and moved to appropriate spot in class.
Thanks for the review martin.
-Justin
Martin Desruisseaux wrote:
> Justin Deoliveira a écrit :
>> Cool. I thought there might be something out there... So yes, I would be
>> fine with just making the method I wrote call through. So it would look
>> like this:
>>
>> Integer getEPSGCode( CoordinateReferenceSystem crs ) {
>>
>> Identifier id = AbstractIdentifiedObject.getIdentifier( crs,
>> Citations.EPSG );
>>
>> if ( id != null ) {
>> return id.getCode();
>> }
>>
>> return null;
>> }
>>
>> What do you think Martin?
>
>
> Sound fine (with the addition of Integer.parseInt). Should we move it just
> above
> the "lookupIdentifier" method in order to keep related-methods together?
>
> Martin
>
> !DSPAM:4007,4740d2eb209911804284693!
>
--
Justin Deoliveira
The Open Planning Project
http://topp.openplans.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
