I'm not aware of anyone raising this issue, and cannot comment on it from personal knowledge.
I'll try to dig a little deeper and see what the provenance of the 19125 spec is, but I'd think that the starting point would be the OGC contact (is this Chris?). OGC has a liaison with ISO TC211, but I'm not sure how effective this will be in getting your question answered. I suspect John Herring at Oracle is the best bet, but not sure. Rob On Jan 28, 2008 1:35 AM, Adrian Custer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all, > > I vaguely remember someone commenting on the fact that we were in a bind > with the ISO 19125 "Simple Feature Access" spec related to their > different interpretation of the presence of the boundary in the geometry > object compared to the parent ISO 19107 "Spatial Schema" spec. > > ISO 19125 seems like it would want to use ISO 19107 primitives. However, > these are explicitly stated *not* to contain their boundaries (ISO > 19107:2003, section 6.1, p22) whereas ISO 19125 simple geometries are > explicitly stated *to* contain their boundaries (ISO 19125-1:2004, > section 6.1.2.1, p6). > > > Rob, did you write something about this? Do any of you remember if > someone else wrote up a comment on the subject? Does anyone have any > pointers to get around this clash? Does anyone know if the ISO > committees working on this are planning to provide better guidance? > Finally, does anyone know whom to contact related to these kinds of > questions? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
