Justin Deoliveira ha scritto: > It seems odd to me this kind of development would go on our stable > branch. I mean... the only reason i can see for it is it is a feature > that people have asked for in uDig or GeoServer. And once more that > those projects have decided that it is necessary to do it on their > respective stable branch. > > That said, is this something that is coming in from udig? Or something > that is being used directly from geotools. I guess making people work > against trunk at the moment is a bit cruel.
It's something the corean people wanted from GeoServer, but all the needed fixes are in gt2 (i.e., they want GetFeature to return 3d coordinates if the dataset in postgis has 3d coordinates). > Andrea: Are there fixes since 2.4.0 that we need? Or could we possibly > pin geoserver 1.6.1 against 2.4.0 and not have to worry about the changes? No, I cannot, the watermark patch we agreed to merge in 1.6.1 needs some changes in gt2 as well, as well as another shapefile related that I still have to process. Cheers Andrea ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
