Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea; there are new "official" string functions in town - the work
> Eclesia has been doing on SE1.1 has brought them to light. It looks like
> this allows for some functions with a variable number of parameters. So
> when you do boil this down to a single Expression we may have a better
> function for you to use.
I'll need to see some examples. Anyways, the current code is already
parsing the mixed content
> As for the meaning of the <Lable>....</Label> section I think we would
> all like to the behave like a mini template; it output exactly what is
> between the tags substituting <PropertyName> tags where needed. Can you
> confirm for me that other expressions can be used here - or is it just
> PropertyName?
No no, whatever expression you want. The only issue is that spaces are
being eaten. Imho to make it a good mini template languages we'd have
to preserve spaces instead.
As an alternative, I can roll in a function that behaves like a real
template language, freemarker. I have an experiment in a geoserver
community module that looks more or less like this:
<ogc:Function name="freemarker">
<ogc:Literal><![CDATA[<html><body>
This is bridge <b>${FID.value}</b> whose name is <i>${NAME.value}</i>
</body></html>]]></ogc:Literal>
</ogc:Function>
(FID and NAME are attribute names of the current feature)
Yet, that would require quite a bit more work since that function
requires the support geoserver is providing to wrap gt2 features
into a freemarker model.
Cheers
Andrea
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
