Hi, In my implementation I didn't yet care about the ExtensionType, as it's not a crucial part of the structure. In my plans it could be any type, the important thing is that it shall be accessible somehow, and shall be saved back to the file, when it is saved.
Peter Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > This question is probably most appropriate for Peter. > > I noticed in the GeoTools Javadoc that you supported the GPX > "extensions" element through the use of the ExtensionsType class: > > http://javadoc.geotools.fr/2.5/org/geotools/gpx/bean/ExtensionsType.html > > I'm working on a reader/write implementation for GPX based on JDOM, > and I was thinking about supporting the extensions element by allowing > low-level access to an actual JDOM Element object representing the > "extensions" element. This would allow the client code to easily parse > the contents of the "extensions" element for their own use. > > Do you have any thoughts on this? > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Geotools-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Geotools-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel
